od pseudomagick 2. 11. 2018 23:42
Nedávno jsem psal recenzentovi Flinkenickovi a žádal jsem ho o srovnání EarSonics Velvet vs EarSonics S-EM9.
Bylo mi odpovězeno toto:
"The Velvet and S-EM9 both share an enhanced bass and lower treble. But the Velvet’s bass is focused mostly on sub-bass, where the S-EM9’s is more balanced between sub- and mid-bass. As a result, the Velvet’s bass is punchy and impactful, but its mid-bass is not very natural in tone compared to the S-EM9. The S-EM9 has a bump around 1 Khz which brings its midrange a bit more forward and gives it more focus. By comparison the Velvet’s midrange is thinner and laidback, especially since its lower treble around 7 Khz is more articulated, while it sounds brighter due to a more elevated 12 Khz peak The S-EM9 has great extension, but the upper treble is less prominent. Accordingly, it sounds smoother and closer to neutral, where the Velvet is brighter and more energetic."
Astell&Kern A&futura SE200, Noble Kublai Khan, 64 Audio U12t, Shanling M6 Pro, Astell&Kern AK300, Heco Ascada 2.0, Sennheiser IE8i, Harman Kardon Go+Play, Sony XDR-V1BTDB,Yamaha NX-50